BossuTv Logo
trending_flat
Supreme Court Backs President’s Power On Emergency Rule And Temporary Suspension Of Elected Officials

The Supreme Court has upheld the President’s constitutional power to declare a state of emergency in any state where there is a threat of breakdown of law and order or a slide into chaos and anarchy. In a majority decision of six to one delivered on Monday, the court ruled that such a declaration can include suspending elected officials, provided the suspension is for a limited time and strictly tied to restoring normalcy.​ Delivering the lead judgment, Justice Mohammed Idris held that Section 305 of the Constitution empowers the President to deploy extraordinary measures once emergency rule is proclaimed. He noted that the section does not specify the exact nature of those measures, giving the President discretion on how best to stabilise the affected state.​ The case arose from a suit by Adamawa State and 10 other Peoples Democratic Party […]

trending_flat
Ghana MP Questions ‘Rushed’ Removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo

Nana Agyei Baffour Awuah, Member of Parliament for Manhyia South and Vice Chairman of the Subsidiary Legislation Committee, has strongly criticized the removal of Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo. He described the move as procedurally flawed, unfair, and rushed. President John Mahama on September 1, 2025, dismissed Chief Justice Torkornoo with immediate effect over alleged “stated misbehaviour,” following recommendations from a constitutional committee established under Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution. The decision came just hours after the President received the committee’s report on a petition filed by Ghanaian citizen Daniel Ofori. Notably, this was only one of three petitions submitted against the Chief Justice. Speaking on JoyNews’ Newsfile, Baffour Awuah questioned the speed and selective handling of the petitions, noting that there is no constitutional requirement demanding such urgency. “In the absence of timelines, what was the committee in a […]

trending_flat
US Supreme Court Hears Arguments on Trump’s Order to End Birthright Citizenship

The US Supreme Court is currently deliberating on President Donald Trump's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship for children born in the United States to undocumented immigrants or temporary visa holders. The central issue before the Court is whether lower federal courts have the authority to issue nationwide injunctions that block such executive actions across the entire country. Background of the Executive Order On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order declaring that children born on US soil to parents who are neither citizens nor lawful permanent residents would no longer be granted automatic citizenship. This move challenges the long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."Legal experts widely regard this executive order as conflicting […]

trending_flat
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to let it enforce ban on transgender service members for now

The Trump administration on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to let it begin enforcing a ban on transgender service members, escalating a fight over a controversial policy that has faced numerous legal setbacks in recent weeks. The emergency appeal thrusts the high court into another politically charged dispute over a key aspect of Trump’s agenda. It comes as the justices have increasingly been pressed by the administration to unlock various parts of his agenda that have been held up by lower courts reviewing the legality of the initiatives. The military ban was announced by Trump earlier this year and would have taken effect late last month, but several lower courts issued rulings against it before it could be implemented. In the case at hand, a federal judge in Washington state decided that the policy likely violated the constitutional rights of a number […]

trending_flat
Speaker of Parliament Delays Anti-Gay Bill Court Case.

The Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, has delayed the anticipated court case concerning Ghana’s Anti-Gay Bill. The bill, formally known as the "Promotion of Proper Human Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill," has been a subject of controversy since it was introduced. While proponents argue that it protects traditional Ghanaian values, opponents, including human rights groups, see it as a violation of fundamental freedoms. The case was initially set for hearing, but the Speaker’s decision to postpone it stems from ongoing discussions among MPs to resolve various legal issues surrounding the bill. Some lawmakers have voiced concerns about the bill’s potential conflict with international treaties and Ghana's own constitution. The bill, which seeks to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities and even support for the community, has stirred fierce debate both domestically and internationally. With the court case delayed, public interest remains […]

Login to enjoy full advantages

Please login or subscribe to continue.

Go Premium!

Enjoy the full advantage of the premium access.

Stop following

Unfollow Cancel

Cancel subscription

Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.

Go back Confirm cancellation