
President John Mahama has issued a sharp rebuke to opposition MP Rev. John Ntim Fordjour, accusing him of fabricating claims about suspicious flights and drug trafficking in Ghana. In a thinly veiled reference to Aesop’s fable The Boy Who Cried Wolf, Mahama urged critics to avoid politicizing national security and wasting resources on baseless allegations78.
The clash stems from Fordjour’s recent allegations that two flights—AirMed Flight N823AM and Cavok Air Antonov An-12B—landed in Ghana carrying cocaine and large sums of U.S. currency. The claims, which Fordjour described as a call for accountability, were met with skepticism from the government510. Mahama dismissed the accusations as “games of smoke and mirrors,” emphasizing that Ghana’s security agencies are already stretched thin addressing genuine threats like the conflict in Bawku and rising crime7.
The Allegations and Backlash
Fordjour, a member of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) Minority Caucus, insisted his role was to demand transparency, not to be interrogated. “The information I gave is for [the government] to answer, not for me to be questioned,” he stated, vowing that the Minority would resist any intimidation tactics10. However, Presidential Staffer Nana Yaa Jantuah countered that Mahama, as commander-in-chief, had already conducted preliminary investigations and found no merit to the claims. She likened Fordjour’s actions to political theatrics, asserting, “President Mahama is not a kid; he handles security matters appropriately”5.
The “Crying Wolf” Metaphor
Mahama’s invocation of the “crying wolf” narrative underscores a broader frustration with opposition figures raising unverified alarms. The fable warns that repeated false claims erode credibility—a point Mahama emphasized by stressing Ghana’s limited capacity to chase “unsubstantiated rumours”78. Critics argue the metaphor risks dismissing legitimate concerns, but Mahama’s allies insist the focus should remain on actionable intelligence.
Political Implications
The spat highlights deepening partisan divides ahead of the 2024 elections. While the NPP frames Fordjour’s actions as whistleblowing, the governing NDC dismisses it as a ploy to undermine Mahama’s administration510. The president’s remarks also reflect a strategic effort to position himself as a steady leader amid crises, contrasting with what his camp portrays as the NPP’s destabilizing tactics7.
What’s Next?
With security agencies instructed to investigate Fordjour’s claims, the outcome could sway public perception. If proven false, the episode may reinforce Mahama’s narrative of opposition recklessness. Conversely, if evidence emerges, it could validate Fordjour’s demands for accountability. For now, the debate epitomizes Ghana’s fraught political landscape, where trust in institutions and leaders hangs in the balance.
Be the first to leave a comment